Yesterday’s Brown Bag, “ReThinkPink:
Moving Beyond Breast Cancer Awareness,” featured health activist and medial
sociologist, Gale Sulik. Dr. Sulik, is the author of Pink Ribbon Blues: How
Breast Cancer Culture Undermines Women’s Health, an active blogger, and founder
of the Breast Cancer Consortium.
Her presentation was educational, enlightening, and provocative in which it
focused on the history and evolution of breast cancer awareness campaigns in
America.
In terms of how it all started, what
began as a disease that no one wanted to talk about, eventually turned into
movement of female empowerment. As breast cancer became more widely recognized
and awareness grew, corporations capitalized on the campaign and branded the
pink ribbon campaign. In essence, the ribbon turned into a corporation
advertisement strategy by increasing pink consumerism and raising billions of
dollars for a “good cause.” Dr. Sulik
argued that the consumerism of breast cancer has undermined women’s lived
experiences and obscured controversies surrounding research, diagnoses, and
treatments. By turning the Pink Ribbon into a logo, it ignores the reality of
what living with breast cancer is really like and undermines women’s health.
An important question that Dr.
Sulik raised was, “Why breast cancer?” When looking at the website of the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the leading cause of death among
women in the United States is: 1) heart disease, 2) lung cancer, and 3) breast
cancer. Not to diminish the impact on breast cancer in America, but why aren't
there campaigns as commercialized as the pink ribbon campaign against heart
disease and lung cancer? Dr. Sulik believes that our fascination with breast
cancer is because it pertains to the breast. In other words, Dr. Sulik called
it the “sexy” cancer. When taking a step back, it is easy to see why
corporations have capitalized on the pink ribbon campaign. It’s as simple as
“Sex Sells.
In essence, Dr. Sulik challenged us
to question the goodness of the pink ribbon campaign. Not to totally reject
awareness and fundraising campaigns, but to ask the tough questions. Where is
the money actually going? Who benefits from awareness raising campaigns? Can
corporations become health advocates without some underlying benefit? Which awareness-raising campaigns continue to
objectify women and hold them under the male gaze? Is the information you are getting from these
campaigns truthful or accurate? Asking questions is what being a curious
feminist is all about (Enloe). These questions may not be easy, or always taken
well, but they expose the often well-hidden truth. These are the tough
questions that Dr. Sulik, as a health advocate, pursues.
- Michelle Van Veen '14
I also attended the Brown Bag in the Center for Women's Studies that Tuesday, and found what Gale Sulik said about how we should think about Breast Cancer awareness thought provoking. I have never been one of those pink ribbon consumers who buys things "for the cause" but I have also never questioned the selling of those products or my older sister's obsession with supporting it. What I took away from the talk was how I and others should be more critical about these campaigns and asking those questions you posed above. Why is it that as feminists, we are quick to point out overly sexualized advertisements on television, but not as much when it comes to this. I think it is because we think of breast cancer as a sensitive subject, which it certainly is, but that does not mean we should give companies that exploit the disease a pass on their wrongdoing. What Dr. Sulik presented was an interesting perspective that I now support and vow to keep conscious of. Since the brown bag, I have thought about this issue when looking at things that advertise breast cancer awareness. Because like Dr. Sulik mentioned to us at the brown bag, there is still so much we do not know about this disease, and why is that if we have so many campaigns working to "fight for the cure"? I think this new level of consciousness around the breast cancer awareness campaign is what is necessary by me and the general consumer audience to affect change in the campaign and actually make worthwhile discoveries about this disease in our mother's, sisters, and daughters.
ReplyDelete